Ever worked on a farm?
One wonders whether the state Assembly and Senate members who are so intent on passing the Farmworkers Fair Labor Practices Act have any idea how demanding, time-constricted and physically-challenging farm work is.
Preparing fields for planting, sowing seeds or starting seedlings in fields, caring for and irrigation and eventually, harvesting crops takes time, supreme effort and exceptional timing. There are times when a field (depending on the size) of crops will need just a few workers, other times when it requires 10 or 100 times that number because Mother Nature just doesn't care about human schedules.
When a crop needs to go into the ground, the time element is a matter of days or weeks. The same is true for harvesting. Many hands are needed to ensure that crops are picked when at the height of their ripeness, a period that can last for a few days to a few weeks. In between planting and harvesting, there isn't much work, because Mother Nature does most of what's necessary, supplying sun, wind and rain in usually unpredictable amounts.
The bill before the legislature is one which is more appropriate for factory or hourly workers. Farm work - especially here in New York where the growing season is short - is very seasonal and sporadic. What should farmers do? Pay migrant workers minimum wage or more throughout the summer to stand idly around while crops grow in their fields?
Imagine what that extra time paid out by farmers would do to their bottom lines. Most small-to-medium-sized farms, which employ less than five full-timers year-round, often including the farmer and his/her spouse, would be put out of business by having unionized, pay-scale workers demanding full-time work regardless of whether there's work to do or not.
These legislators in favor of the bill's passage would be well-advised to talk to a few farmers before taking the plunge into another idiotic, socialistic endeavor that does not comport with the realities of farming, but, on its surface, sounds like a great idea to keep people employed and working. It's not.
When tomatoes are $8 a pound, cucumbers are $4 apiece and half the farms in New York shut down because they cant comply with another stupid mandate from Albany, maybe the legislators will understand why this measure should never even be considered at all. If we're to follow the lead of California - which has a form of such a law on its books - we're sure to follow them down the road to bankruptcy, price inflation and an overtaxed state from which people are fleeing in droves.
California's example should be well-noted. The state is a shambles, with high taxes, high costs and regulation piled atop regulation. New York is following along quite well, though we don't share the kind of weather the Golden State has - one that allows for multiple, long growing seasons for a wide array of crops.
As usual, our lawmakers don't or can't perceive the real costs behind passing their proposed legislation. The only thing guiding them is the usual need to buy more votes for their re-election campaigns, based on the false promises of "fairness" and "equality," all along ignoring the real-world strictures of the farm industry, for both large and small farmers.
Eight dollar a pound tomatoes sounds like a good idea to me. I'll grow and sell dozens in my back yard and make a fortune. Oh, and then the state can come and tax me, too.
What New York farmers and Americans need now is not more regulations, but less. The politicians just don't get it and probably never will.